Maryam Alizadeh; Hamidreza Hajibabaeei; vahid Vahedjavan
Abstract
shabastri makes hermeneutics the basis of understanding the Qur'an and believes that with advancement of science in the world arena, the methods of the past in understanding the Qur'an are not responsible for Muslims. According to Shabastri's opinion, the Qur'an as a sacred historical text should be ...
Read More
shabastri makes hermeneutics the basis of understanding the Qur'an and believes that with advancement of science in the world arena, the methods of the past in understanding the Qur'an are not responsible for Muslims. According to Shabastri's opinion, the Qur'an as a sacred historical text should be understood with hermeneutics, which deals with the truth of how to understand, and the neglect of hermeneutic issues in the interpretation of the Qur'an causes many interpretative differences. Based on this, he tried to present interpretations of the Holy Qur'an, which is facing serious harmWith the aim of investigating these damages, this research examines the fundamental and methodological damages of shabastri's hermeneutic perspective on the interpretation of the Qur'an with analytical-critical method. Hermeneutic thought of Shabstari has suffered from internal conflict due to the lack of providing a clear definition and nature and has a fundamental damage. Also, the failure to adopt a single approach in the use of hermeneutics in author-centered issue, inappropriate use of prejudice and presupposition, and being influenced by external factors have caused damage to the method of interpreting the Qur'an. Therefore, shabastri did not have a single approach in the use of hermeneutics, and this leads to relativism.
meysam sadeghi turanposhti; Yahya Mirhoseini; ahmad zarezardini
Abstract
One of the divisions of the text of the Qur'an next to the verse, surah, hizb and Juz' is called " ruku';" A set of verses that are very similar in subject and meaning and unlike most Qur'anic divisions, the number of letters and words does not interfere in determining its scope. despite the the remarkable ...
Read More
One of the divisions of the text of the Qur'an next to the verse, surah, hizb and Juz' is called " ruku';" A set of verses that are very similar in subject and meaning and unlike most Qur'anic divisions, the number of letters and words does not interfere in determining its scope. despite the the remarkable importance of ruku' in reading and interpretation, it has received less attention than its other counterparts. the oldest memorable mention of ruku's dates back to the fourth century AH; where for the supererogatory nights of Ramadan, parts of the Qur'an should be recited after the sura al-Fatiha. from then on, the usages and necessity of paying attention to the ruku's gradually increased until its sign appeared in the margins of some mus'hafs. the present article, in a descriptive-analytical method, first tries to discuss the relationship between Quranic ruku's and paragraphing by text reading studies. then tell about the place of Quranic ruku's in islamic culture and finally explain its benefits in the form of the functions of reciting the Quran (propaganda and educational aspect) and writing commentary (scientific aspect).
nosrat nilsaz; hadi zeini malekabad
Volume 3, Issue 2 , November 2019, , Pages 31-56
Abstract
The ancient legacy is rich in information that clarifies the core of the formation of various sciences. The author of Abū ʻUbaydah Maʻmar ibn al-Muthanná al-Taymī is one of the most important works of literary and linguistic research that has had a great impact on the subsequent work This ...
Read More
The ancient legacy is rich in information that clarifies the core of the formation of various sciences. The author of Abū ʻUbaydah Maʻmar ibn al-Muthanná al-Taymī is one of the most important works of literary and linguistic research that has had a great impact on the subsequent work This research has been conducted through an in-text and outsourced approach to analyze the perceived concept and its functions in the virtual world. From the point of view of external textual analysis, considering the time of its emergence, the cultural situation and the author's motivation, one can find an accurate analysis of the scientists' view of the effect of scientific and scientific support for introspection analysis. From the internal point of view, with the author's analysis of the language of the Qur'an, his view of the importance of poetry in theology and interpretation, as well as his understanding of the concept of interpretation, can be drawn from the point of view of the permissible conceptual domain. Abū ʻUbaydah used various explanatory tools such as vocabulary, syntax, rhetoric, and reading to explain the permitted nature.
Maryam Qobadi
Volume 2, Issue 2 , November 2018, , Pages 85-100
Abstract
Although there is no mention of reason in the interpretation of the term interpretation, the ontological presence of reason can be found in its semantic analysis. The meanings of interpretation (interpretation, reference, beginning and end, end and end, epistle and reference, addition, correction, policy, ...
Read More
Although there is no mention of reason in the interpretation of the term interpretation, the ontological presence of reason can be found in its semantic analysis. The meanings of interpretation (interpretation, reference, beginning and end, end and end, epistle and reference, addition, correction, policy, change, discipline, and fate) can be analyzed in various ways, including change, evolution, transcendence, return, and link to the beginning. And the bottom, and the ... watchers are some kind of directional and tele-motion. Basically, it is not possible to imagine a destination without a destination, as it is meaningless to talk about a destination without a destination. Focusing on this point leads to the emergence of an awareness, thought, and thought in the entity of the word of interpretation, which is at its very core. In fact, rationality is the necessary meaning of interpretation, and without it interpretation cannot be possible, but it will not be possible. Hence, in verse 7 of Al-Imran the standard of human interpretation, in addition to being attributed to Allah (inclusive of all nouns), there is intrusion into science. Regarding the disputes raised in this field, the focus is on the science or the emphasis Human science refers to the interplay of interpretation with science and consciousness and it seems that science without rationality cannot be conceived.However, this dimension has been neglected by interpretation, but also by the opposition and has essentially been reduced to a sectarian category. Whereas linking, or more accurately, to interpretation and rationality, is a serious matter, and of course requires expression. This paper analyzes the rationale of this authoritative element, with a brief reference to the necessity and why, through the proposed rules, principles, and conditions, and has come to the conclusion that rationality is the rational element of interpretation. It will not be an interpretation, and it may be based on whim and interpretation of the vote.
Hajarkhtun Ghadamijuybari; S. Hedayat Jalili
Volume 2, Issue 2 , November 2018, , Pages 101-120
Abstract
The interpretive legacy of Muslims is a plural, diverse and fluid area. The methodological, objective, and academic explanation and interpretation of this multifaceted and diverse field is the subject of interpretative research. One of the aspects and aspects of the interpretation of the study is the ...
Read More
The interpretive legacy of Muslims is a plural, diverse and fluid area. The methodological, objective, and academic explanation and interpretation of this multifaceted and diverse field is the subject of interpretative research. One of the aspects and aspects of the interpretation of the study is the proper explanation of the "phenomenon of interpretation". Muslim commentators and commentators have had varied and varied interpretations of the phenomenon of "commentary" throughout history, but what appears to be a flaw in interpretations of commentary on "interpretation". The study of most of these perceptions of 'interpretation' shows that they have turned to lexical analysis of 'interpretation' rather than explaining the phenomenon of interpretation, and attempt to differentiate between 'interpretation' and 'non-interpretation'. It does not answer today's questions and needs, and these definitions have not been successful in explaining the reality of 'interpretation'.The main issue of this study is to what extent have the definitions of the commentators and the commentators been successful in explaining the reality of the “interpretation”? How have scholars interpreted, understood, and interpreted the interpretation of "interpretation", and what is their understanding of the "phenomenon of interpretation"? What mechanisms and rules do you employ in this way? How clear and efficient is the terminology and set of concepts provided as epistemic tools for analyzing and interpreting interpretations?
