Authors

Abstract

Salawāt upon the Prophet Mohammad and his family is a phrase frequently expressed or heard by Muslims in their daily life. Primarily, salawāt is communicated to admire the Prophet and his family; however, it has secondary pragmatic functions in Muslims’ daily communications and oral speeches. The main question this paper addresses to is what communicative functions salawāt plays in the social interactions of Iranian and Iraqi Shiite Muslims’ and if there is any difference in the functions of salawāt among these two communities. This research is done in the context of linguistic pragmatics and specifically John Searle’s speech acts theory. The research shows that in addition to its locutionary function, salawāt has illocutionary functions, such as directive, expressive, commissive, and declarative, as well. It also shows that the goal behind the directive usage of salawāt is indirectness. In the case of expressive function, the goal is foregrounding emotions. As for commissive function, salawāt helps to sanctify the commitment. In the declarative speech act of salawāt, the purpose is manufacturing consent and drawing attentions.

Keywords

پهلوان‌نژاد، محمدرضا و مهدی رجب‌زاده (1389). «تحلیل متن‌شناسی زیارت‌نامة حضرت امام رضا (ع) بر پایة نظریة کنش گفتار»، در مطالعات اسلامی: فلسفه و کلام، ش 2/ 85.
ساجدی، ابوالفضل (1381). «نظریة کنش گفتاری جان آستین و فهم زبان قرآن»، در قبسات، ش 25.
فضائلی، مریم و محمد نگارش (1390). «تحلیل خطبة پنجاه‌ویکم نهج‌البلاغه بر اساس طبقه‌بندی سرل از کنش‌های گفتار»، در علوم قرآن و حدیث، ش 86.
یول، جورج (1391). کاربردشناسی زبان، ترجمة محمد عموزاده جهرمی و منوچهر توانگر، تهران: سمت.
 
Austin, L. J. (1962). How to do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon.
Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics & Phonetics, Oxford: Blackwell.
Goldman, K. L. (2013). “A Walk in Our Shoes: A Discussion of Relevance and Communication”, In Teacher Prep, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2).
Grice, P. (1975). “Logic and Conversation”, In Peter Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, Vol. 3, New York: Academic Press.
Mehawesh, M. I. and A. A. Jaradat (2015). “Inshallah: Extensive Flouting of Grice’s Maxim of Quality”, in Asian Social Science, Vol. 11, No. 4.
Nazal, A. (2005). “The Pragmatic Functions of the Recitation of Qur'anic Verses by Muslims in their Oral Genre: The Case of Insha'Allah, 'God's Willing'”, in Pragmatics, Vol. 15, No 2 & 3.
Pishghadam, R. and P. Norouz Kermanshahi (2012). “Insha' Allah (God's Willing) and Its Functions in Persian”, in CS Canada: Studies in Literature and Language, Vol. 4, No. 1.
Searle, J. (1969). Corpus, Concordance, Collocations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. (1975). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts, In Günderson, K. (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minneapolis Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7, University of Minneapolis Press.
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. and P. Simpson (1969). Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-cultural Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verdonik, D. and Z. Kačič (2012). “Pragmatic Functions of Christian Expressions in Spoken Discourse”, in Linguistica, Vol. 5, No. 1.