Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mahsa Alidad Abhari ¹
• Alireza Fakhari ²

¹ Quran and Hadith Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University

² Associate Professor, Quran and Hadith Sciences Department, Allameh Tabatabai University

Abstract

It is clear that thoughts and scholars are changing in certain, unwanted or self -evident situations. This change, while it can emerge in each of the theoretical and practical domains, is possible in various forms such as "justice, silence, confusion, ambiguity and neglect". One of the methodological missions is to observe such conditions to provide a more accurate picture of the subject (= object). In addition, the examination of these ups and downs of this scientific uphill has significant epistemological and methodological results; For example, conflict in the foundations, changes and changes of the logic of the interpreter's understanding over time and in the evolution of his scientific personality. Investigating Ayatollah Javadi Ameli's interpretive votes in the verses of the woman's subject, in analyzing the propositions and matching them with their interpretive foundations, shows some kind of conflict between the interpretive views with the foundations below some of the verses. The results suggest that although they generally have had a major adherence to their foundations, they have experienced aspects of change, transformation, and crossing the foundations that are in place of reflection.

Keywords

• Javadi Amoli
• Fundamentals
• Logic of Understanding
• Tasnim Interpretation
• Methodology
• Woman

Main Subjects

• Quranic Studies