Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Fardin Darabi ¹
• Roohallah Mohamad Alinejad Omran ²

¹ Ph.D. student of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

² Associate Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Alameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In the review of the hermeneutic flow, we are looking for the issue of whether methodological studies in contemporary Quranic studies are a flow or not? The current research investigates descriptively and evaluates their relationship with each other by analyzing the theme. The philosophical hermeneutic paradigm of interpreter-centered, from which the relativism of understanding is deduced, and hermeneutics of a method (text) that is text-centered and author-centered and deals with the understanding of religious texts in an absolutist manner, has caused bipolarity among Muslims. Accordingly, in terms of absolutism and relativism, the discussions of "classical hermeneutics" with absolutism approach and the characteristic of "modern hermeneutics" are relativism and "postmodern hermeneutics" which originates from the critique of modern hermeneutics and in which there is no central interpreter and anyone can play the role of interpreter regardless of the text. play a central role and all are correct. In general, there is a certain consensus in relativism and absolutism among the orientalists and thinkers of the Islamic world, but it is in contrast with the scientists of Iran and there are opposite results, and in terms of the perspective of the historical period, there is more similarity and kinship.

Keywords

• hermeneutic paradigm
• contemporary thinkers of the Islamic world
• philosophical hermeneutics
• methodological hermeneutics
• modern and postmodern hermeneutics

Main Subjects

• Quranic Studies