نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
This article examines the concepts of power, justice, and obedience in selected Sunni and Imami Shiʿi Qur’anic commentaries through a digital-qualitative approach. It asks how these three concepts are constructed in the exegetical traditions of the two schools and how they shape the political discourse of the Qur’an. The study analyzes relevant verses concerning authority, command, sovereignty, justice, equity, trust, obedience, and ulū al-amr in nine major commentaries: al-Ṭabarī, al-Zamakhsharī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, al-Qurṭubī, Ibn Kathīr, al-Ṭūsī, al-Ṭabrisī, ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī, and Tafsīr-i Nemūneh. The method combines close reading, qualitative coding, thematic analysis, and comparative discourse analysis. The findings show that power is generally understood not as mere domination, but as trust, judgment, guidance, and responsibility. Justice functions as an internal criterion of legitimacy and a means of limiting authority. Obedience, likewise, is not absolute; it is tied to truth, divine command, justice, and legitimate authority. The main difference between the two exegetical traditions appears in their interpretation of ulū al-amr. The article argues that a digital-qualitative approach can provide a transparent and comparable model for analyzing the political discourse of the Qur’an.
کلیدواژهها English
